The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On October 2, 2012, the Defendant, at around 06:12, committed an indecent act by force against the victim’s chest, frying the e-mail in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, or inside the third floor of the e-mail and the third floor of the e-mail and so on.

2. On October 2, 2012, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant continued to enter a water room on October 2, 2012, and did not enter the victim’s place of release on bail, thereby inducing indecent act by force. Therefore, the Defendant did not have committed indecent act by force.

3. There are victims, G police and legal statements, H’s legal statement, investigation report (CCTV’s form and accompanying suspect pictures) as evidence that seems to fit the facts charged in the instant case.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court can be comprehensively taken into account the following circumstances: (i) the indoors of the soup suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping suping supings that were difficult for the victim to properly see the face of the offender; (ii) the victim did not verify whether the victim, even when suping suping

In the process of selecting the defendant as an offender rather than the offender, the defendant was judged as the offender of this case. After that determination, the offender of this case appears to be the defendant by memorying the face of the defendant confirmed thereafter, ④ the witness G did not see the appearance of the offender, ④ the witness H only showed the rear surbling of the offender, and the witness H did not readily conclude that the defendant was the offender because he did not see it, ⑤ CCTV images installed in soup and so on are too bad, and this is also the offender.