logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.15 2018고정1140
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 6, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court 2013Guhap2239, which filed against the head of the Incheon Tax Office located in Nam-dong Incheon District Court No. 416, the Incheon District Court of Law No. 416, which filed against C, to the head of the Incheon Tax Office.

1. In the above trial, the Defendant asked the Defendant that “I will not proceed to the Plaintiff’s name after the Plaintiff’s agent was not in Korea, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit of objection against a third party in the name of the Plaintiff, and the first instance, the second instance, and the Supreme Court became final and conclusive.”

The answer to the “I” and the “Is no person who has appointed D counsel at the first instance court.”

I would like to ask "I will not".

The answer is that “the witness has filed a lawsuit, such as this first instance judgment,” and the witness is not required to do so.

It is asked “I have no lawsuit.”

The testimony was made to the effect that “D attorneys testified to the effect that they were the witness,” and that “D attorneys testified to the effect that they were “I have no litigant in this lawsuit.”

However, in fact, the defendant appointed D lawyer and proceeded with the lawsuit in the name of C in the lawsuit against the third party.

2. In the above trial, the defendant appointed a lawyer as his agent and applied for the suspension of compulsory execution against the defendant. On August 28, 2000, the court asked the defendant about the order to provide the security was deposited in the amount of KRW 5 million. However, the defendant asked the defendant that the witness was only one."

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, there was a fact that the defendant made the above deposit.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (A);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Court rulings and orders to provide security;

arrow