All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant is too unafford and unfair because of the sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution), and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unafford and unfair.

2. Circumstances favorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant reflects the crime, the fact that there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and the fact that a new sales contract to revise or supplement the sales contract, which was the basis of the crime, was concluded after the crime of this case, and that the existing sales contract appears to have been implicitly rescinded, may be somewhat taken into account after the crime of this case, etc., but the fact that the crime is not good in light of the frequency of the crime, method of the crime, and amount of damage, etc. is committed,

Considering the above circumstances and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, health, sexual behavior, environment, etc., it is difficult to deem that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.