All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable due to the defendant's punishment (six months of imprisonment with prison labor) of the court below, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unfied and unfair.

2. The following are circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, even though he/she had the record of punishment due to the same type of crime, such as being sentenced to imprisonment twice or more times; and (b) the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

Considering the above circumstances and the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s occupation, age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.