logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.06.19 2015구합2895
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is the South African Republic and the Republic of South Africa dual nationality.

In other words, after entering the Republic of Korea on August 30, 2013, the Defendant applied for refugee status on September 4, 2013.

On February 4, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have “a well-founded fear of persecution” as prescribed by Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act.

On February 26, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 26, 2014, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the said objection on September 30, 2014.

[Based on the basis of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the validity of the disposition of this case, the plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case is legitimate, and the plaintiff believed that she is an EgbO from EgbO, EgO, EgO, EgO, EgO, Isia, and Isia. The plaintiff's attached was an Isia's intention to traditional religion, which is the pasia, which is a new Isia in the above village.

The plaintiff was required to succeed to a private position as a head of South Korea, but refused to succeed to a private position in traditional religion on the ground of religious faith.

When the plaintiff refused to succeed to private positions, the plaintiff's her 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' came to death because 's 's 's 's '' was refused to succeed to private positions' was sent to the South African Republic several times from 2000 to 2013, and one of the 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's

As such, when the plaintiff returned to the Republic of Maria or South Africa, there exists a well-founded fear of persecution for religious reasons, and the defendant recognizes the plaintiff as a refugee.

arrow