1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff entered Korea first and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on August 24, 2012.

On March 13, 2014, the Defendant issued a non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no “probably-founded fear of persecution” (see Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees).

On May 9, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on May 9, 2014, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the said objection on December 16, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition in the entirety of the arguments and the statements in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire argument was lawful. The Plaintiff believed that the Plaintiff was a fluorian Ebaritho Lbari Lbaei Uudio (Mbbagu) Lbastro Gumbace from the village. The Plaintiff’s proposal was the dead body of village traditional religion that newly fluoro.

Around the 17 years of age, the Plaintiff demanded the Plaintiff to succeed to a private position, but the Plaintiff rejected it on the ground of religious belief, and after the death of March 10, 2012, the Plaintiff forced the Plaintiff to succeed to a private position and forced the village to leave the private position as the body of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff escaped to the Gagos’s church.

The Plaintiff’s mother died on May 2012 due to stressed stress, and the village users called the Plaintiff’s mobile phone several times, and the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with the aid of the Lins church pastor.

If the plaintiff returns to ASEAN, he/she is a member of a religious and social group.