The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that at around 19:00 on September 19, 2014, three managing bodies, including the head of the apartment management office, and 15 representatives of the apartment complex, etc., such as the head of the apartment management office, and the 15 representatives of the apartment complex, etc., attend the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Residents' Representatives on the part of the apartment management office, and the victim E and F continuously raise the problem of the Dong representative meeting, and the victim E and F refers to victims on the part of the above people.

1. Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine and Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

The word "I" means.

The victims were openly insultingd by the large sound called “news” to the end of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. Part of the charge No. 1 (A. B. D. with several dialogues, which is similar to the ney and civil evidence, is essential to this part.

I ambaly, I ambaly and I ambast.

It is so-called Dog-ri's unique and distinguished from each other.

Defamation referred to in the offense of insult is an expression of an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that could undermine the people's social evaluation without indicating the facts.

In such a case, since the language is the most basic means of human expression and can be different for each person, all of them cannot be punished as a crime of insult under the Criminal Act on the grounds that the expression is somewhat vague and indecent.

Therefore, if a certain expression is not likely to undermine the social evaluation of the other party’s personal value, even if such expression was expressed in a somewhat unusual and indecent manner, it cannot be deemed as constituting the element of the crime of insult (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do6622, Dec. 24, 2015). The following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court are, namely, ①.