(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정864

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정864

명예훼손

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:30 on January 6, 2015, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by speaking to the large voice, “In short, the Defendant was flicking another male, flicking, and flicking with the other male, and flicking with the other male, and flicking with the other male, and flicking with the other male,” while talking with the victim E as a matter of virtual transfer problems.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Application of the respective legal statements of witness E and F to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person running D in Ulsan-gun C. Ulsan-gun.

At around 23:30 on January 6, 2015, the Defendant had a conversation with the victim E and his male-gu F, and at the same time, there were six employees and two customers at the time, and the Defendant had a conversation with each other, among which, the Defendant had a male-child custody F, “not a third village.” The Defendant was living immediately with the victim’s male-child custody F. The Defendant was living with the other male, who was 6 to 70 million won, and 4 years together with another male. The Defendant was living with the third male, who was not a third village. It was not a second village, but a third village, which was a bad year.” The Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. In order to find a guilty of primary facts charged, the principal purport of the Defendant’s talked at the time of the instant case, that is, the victim intentionally accessed another male, such as so-called “snick-snick”.

It shall be proved without any reasonable doubt that the content of the victim's living with another male or with another male.

However, the witness G is in this court.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고정3430

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.12.19 2018고단3249

-의정부지방법원 2014.01.08 2013고정1270

-서울동부지방법원 2015.01.30 2014노1701

-부산지방법원 2017.06.22 2016고정2480