logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.30 2014누61622
유족보상금부지급등처분취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 10, 1997, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was appointed as a public official in food sanitation service and started to work at a public school. From September 10, 2007 to February 29, 2012, he worked as a nutrition teacher at D elementary schools, and from March 1, 2012 to E elementary schools, he worked as a nutrition teacher.

B. On June 18, 2013, around 11:40 on June 18, 2013, the Deceased filed an application for food distribution preparation in the E Elementary School Meal Service room, and filed an application for the symptoms of the sabroma in the safafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafab, but the safafafafab

As a result of the blood pressure measurement of the deceased at the above hospital, the Hg and 120 meters Egmpheric pressure from the blood pressure of the deceased was turned back to Hgg, and CT shooting confirmed to be cerebral blood.

The Deceased was transferred to Aju University Hospital on the same day, and it was judged impossible to perform the operation as a result of the inspection, and was transferred to Samsung Seoul Hospital on the same day.

On June 25, 2013, the Deceased died from cerebral Sponia, a direct death at Samsung Seoul Hospital, and cerebral Sponia, an intermediate preemptive event.

C. On July 10, 2013, the Plaintiff, the husband of the deceased, claimed that the deceased’s cerebrovascular and death was a disease or death on official duty, and claimed compensation for survivors of the deceased due to the payment of expenses incurred in relation to medical care due to the deceased’s hospitalization and the death.

However, on September 27, 2013, when considering the medical characteristics of 'cerebrovascular' to the Plaintiff, it is difficult to view that the disease of the Deceased was a result of performing his duties, and it is difficult to view that there was an excessive work beyond the ordinary and ordinary scope. According to the health insurance care content of the Deceased, the disease of the Deceased was caused by an excessive stress in the line of duty. In full view of the fact that it was confirmed that the Deceased had received continuous medical treatment from urology and high blood pressure since 2003.

. rather than that.

arrow