1. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant compensation for survivors’ compensation to the Plaintiff, and a decision not to grant medical treatment for official duties.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 10, 1997, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was appointed as a public official in food sanitation service and started to work at a public school. From September 10, 2007 to February 29, 2012, he worked as a nutrition teacher at D elementary schools, and from March 1, 2012 to E elementary schools, he worked as a nutrition teacher.

B. On June 18, 2013, around 11:40 on June 18, 2013, the Deceased filed an application for food distribution preparation in the E Elementary School Meal Service room, and filed an application for the symptoms of the sabroma in the safafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafab, but the safafafafab

As a result of the blood pressure measurement of the deceased at the above hospital, the Hg and 120 meters Egmpheric pressure from the blood pressure of the deceased was turned back to Hgg, and CT shooting confirmed to be cerebral blood.

The Deceased was transferred to Aju University Hospital on the same day, and it was judged impossible to perform the operation as a result of the inspection, and was transferred to Samsung Seoul Hospital on the same day.

On June 25, 2013, the Deceased died from cerebral Sponia, a direct death at Samsung Seoul Hospital, and cerebral Sponia, an intermediate preemptive event.

C. On July 10, 2013, the Plaintiff, the husband of the deceased, claimed that the deceased’s cerebrovascular and death was a disease or death on official duty, and claimed compensation for survivors of the deceased due to the payment of expenses incurred in relation to medical care due to the deceased’s hospitalization and the death.

However, on September 27, 2013, the Defendant deemed that “the disease of the deceased, when considering the medical characteristics of cerebrovascular, is difficult to view that it resulted from the performance of his duties, and that there was an excessive work beyond the ordinary and ordinary scope of the deceased.” According to the health insurance care content of the deceased, it is difficult to view that the disease of the deceased was caused by occupational stress or stress. In full view of the fact that it was confirmed that the deceased had received continuous medical treatment from urology and high blood pressure since 2003.

. rather than that.