Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced by the Incheon District Court to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.), injury, confinement, etc., three years and six months, the attachment of an electronic tracking device for five years after the expiration of the term of punishment, and the completion of 80 hours for a sexual assault treatment program at the Supreme Court around July 28, 201, and the appeal was dismissed and finalized.

In addition, the Defendant, who has completed the term of punishment, was notified by the protection observation officer of the Incheon Protection Office, that he/she should attach his/her location tracking electronic device from April 10, 2014 to April 9, 2019, and that he/she should observe his/her obligations and obligations as a person subject to protection observation.

As such, the Defendant is a person subject to the attachment and protection of an electronic device.

A person wearing an electronic device or a person subject to the surveillance of protection shall not, without justifiable grounds, violate the matters to be observed under the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. without any justifiable reason after receiving a warning, in violation of the said Act.

On October 6, 2014, without good cause, the Defendant sent out to the new wall time zone during which he/she is able to give an opportunity or impulse to repeat a crime, such as night, and refused to provide community service or attend a lecture on March 21, 2015, and received a written warning as he/she fails to comply with the instruction and supervision of the protection observation officer on October 26, 2016.

As such, in the case of the Busan District Court Branch Branch Branch, the Defendant, who violated the obligations without justifiable grounds, does not leave the Defendant from 10:0 to 6:00 a.m. on Nov. 10, 2016 on the following day.

Provided, however, the Defendant was notified in writing around November 17, 2016. (a) the Defendant, upon obtaining permission from the protective observation officer, did not drink more than 0.05% alcohol level during blood transfusion; and (b) when the protective observation officer gives instructions to measure drinking, he/she shall comply therewith.

Nevertheless, the defendant is again without good cause.