logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.08.22 2013고단1328
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of thirty million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:30 on May 31, 2013, the Defendant driven a non-registered two-wheeled vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.193% without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the small park located in the Jung-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (234) to the front of the 6910 km-dong, Sungnam-si (6910).

2. A defendant who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act;

5. 31. 20:30 Driving a non-registered two-wheeled two-wheeled motor vehicle, the front road was driven from the direction of the river basin in the direction of the new interesting basin at the speed of two lanes, 6910, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-si.

At the time, there are four lanes in which vehicle traffic volume is high, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and accurately operating the steering gear for the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded without reducing the speed, and continued to do so, and received the back part of the victim B's C Launa vehicle B, which was driven earlier, as the front part of the two-wheeled vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, at the same time, committed an occupational negligence on the part of the victim D (V, 30 years of age), who was on board the said rocketing vehicle, suffered from tensions and tensions of the bellet that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, did not stop immediately to cause damage to KRW 484,953 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of rocketing vehicles owned by the victim B, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated a registered two-wheeled automobile not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow