logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.11 2015고정1326
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who receives personal information from a personal information manager operating an Internet site D (E) for the purpose of processing civil petitions, such as the name, resident registration number, cell phone number, etc. of a civil petitioner, in the process of responding to civil petitions related to F through the Internet site (E) at COC Team.

No person who receives personal information from a personal information manager shall use the personal information for any purpose other than the intended purpose.

Nevertheless, on September 22, 2014, the Defendant assessed the satisfaction assessment of the victim G’s response on his/her civil petition at the victim’s website as “competion,” and assessed the satisfaction assessment of the victim’s additional answers by using the victim’s personal information provided in his/her duties at the company C office located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and assessed the satisfaction assessment of the victim’s additional answers as “competion.”

Accordingly, the defendant used the victim's personal information for a purpose other than the purpose provided by the personal information manager.

Summary of Evidence

1. Of the witness I and the witness I’s each legal statement in the court room, the part that “the defendant was reported by the J to the effect that he/she led to the confession of a crime is excluded.”

(1) The witness J’s statement also states that “The Defendant gave a statement to the effect that he/she led to the confession of a crime from the Defendant,” and this part is a so-called “specific statement” with the content of the Defendant’s statement. Thus, this part is admitted as evidence, since it is a so-called “specific statement.”

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of civil petitions and answers by complainants;

1. Article 71 of the Personal Information Protection Act and Article 71 of the same Act concerning criminal facts as well as the selection of punishment;

arrow