The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The fact that text messages have been sent twice from the Defendant’s cell phone in which there was a mistake of facts regarding the facts stated in the facts charged is true, but since the offender who sent text messages is not the Defendant but H, the lower court’s judgment that recognized the Defendant’s violation of the Personal Information Protection Act is unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The Defendant was a former head of Jeju Special Self-Governing Gu B. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant was released from the Defendant to the Defendant for the Defendant of the Seoul Special Party Do Party Do Party Do. A person who was provided personal information from a personal information manager may not use the personal information for any purpose other than the intended one or provide it to a third party. Nevertheless, around May 15, 2015, the Defendant, as a secretary of the Seoul Special Party Do Party Do Party Do Council member Council managing the personal information of the members of the Seoul Special Party Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 2, who was kept in custody, sent the Defendant’s election campaign text messages to the Defendant at the Seoul Special Party Do Do Do 2’s election campaign site on September 16, 2015, and the Defendant sent such text messages to the Defendant’s personal information manager on September 24, 2015, and then sent it to the Seoul Special Party Ha.