logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.06.18 2015고단987
상해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around December 26, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driven a e-car with approximately four meters of alcohol at approximately 0.110% under the influence of alcohol on the street from 16th of Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, about 6-ro, Seoul, with a alcohol level of 0.10%.

B. During the time, at the place, as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the injured Defendant injured the victim F (math, 31 years of age) and the parking problem, franchising the victim’s head collection by hand, and flachising the victim’s face and head by drinking the victim’s face and head, thereby causing injury to the victim, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendants were arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault according to the police officer guard H and guard I belonging to the G police box, who was called out after receiving a report from F by assaulting F and F during the time, at the time, at the place, and at the time, at the time, in accordance with the preceding paragraph, and as mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

Defendant

A was notified of the purport of the facts of the crime, the reason for arrest, and the right to appoint a counsel, but failed to comply with the arrest, and attempted to flee, and the circumstances of A used the lock. Defendant B committed assault, such as the following: (a) the flab, the flab, and the flab, and the flab, the flab, in order to interfere with this; and (b) the flab.

Before that, Defendant A had H face with head on the wheelchairs of the motor vehicle parked by her hand with the wheel of the motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit violence, thereby obstructing the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, and I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control, and inquiry into the results of the drinking driving control;

1. Symmetric photo (Defendant B);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on bals photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense;

arrow