logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2014.02.19 2013노343
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)등
Text

The judgment below

The guilty portion shall be reversed.

Defendant

A A Fines of 30,00,000 won, Defendant B, C, D, and E shall be punished by each fine of 10.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendants 1) embezzlement of Paragraph 2 of the judgment of misunderstanding of facts (Defendant A, B, and C) (1) that Defendant C distributed KRW 142,500,000 to each of the accounts in the name of the employees of K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”) and Defendant B. However, the said money was a personal fund of Defendant C (or Defendant C’s wife AG), and Defendant C lent it to Defendant B as apartment sale price.

② Defendant A was aware of the fact that Defendant B received KRW 140,500,000 from Defendant C in the last time and did not participate in the embezzlement of this part.

B) From May 26, 2008, N related to embezzlement of KRW 27 million (Defendant A or D) on May 26, 2008, as stated in the judgment of the court below, paid KRW 73 million in cash out of KRW 110 million on May 21, 2008, and Defendant D withdrawn the above KRW 73 million and delivered it to A. However, the remaining KRW 27 million to pay the money borrowed from Defendant A under the name of the above Defendant, such as the foregoing stated value, and Defendant D remitted the money to Defendant E’s employees under the name of Defendant E-T’s short-term account to return the money under the name of Defendant E-T’s own name (which was not only remitted to Defendant E-T’s account but also remitted to Defendant E-T’s short-term account to Defendant 1, 300,000 won).

② Defendant E only withdrawn and distributed the money that was remitted according to Defendant A’s instruction. As such, Defendant E has no intent to acquire unlawful profits.

2..

arrow