The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is contrary to the recognition of and against the instant crime, the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution without being aware of the fine imposed by the same force on several occasions, and without being aware of the suspension of execution. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, criminal records, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, means, methods and outcome, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) cannot be deemed to be inappropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.