The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the recognition of and against the instant criminal act, the Defendant again committed the instant criminal act without being aware of the Defendant’s age, criminal records, character and conduct, family environment, motive, circumstance, means, method, and consequence of the instant criminal act, etc., such as the Defendant’s age, criminal records, character and conduct, home environment, motive, means, and circumstance before and after the instant criminal act, and the circumstances before and after the instant criminal act, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is appropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.