logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.01.22 2019고합86
상해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the above sentence against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, around 01:30 on December 2, 2018, at the front day of the Seojin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the following day: (a) around 01:30 on the day: (b) around December 2, 2018, Defendant A, on the ground that the victim D (n't, 20 years of age) contacted with other men, went beyond the victim’s face at hand on a hand; (c) the victim’s face was exposed to a short time; (d) the victim’s face was exposed to a short time; and (e) the victim’s face was exposed to a short time during two weeks of treatment; and (e) the victim’s face was exposed to a short time; and (e) the victim’s face was exposed to a short time during two weeks of treatment. Defendant A, at around 07:20 on November 16, 2018, continued to see the victim’s face at the price of the victim’s 21st century.

As a result, Defendant A assaulted the victim by carrying dangerous objects.

Summary of Evidence

"2019Gohap86"

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A complaint filed in D;

1. Investigation report (the state of damage caused by a complainant, hearing of the fact of damage caused by a complainant, submitting photographs of a victim, etc.);

1. A medical certificate "2019, 87";

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B and G;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. The defendant A, such as an internal photograph of the music hole and a photograph of the damaged part of the body, asserts that the victim does not take place when the victim was a beer disease.

However, there is no reason to suspect the credibility of the victim's statement corresponding to this part of the facts charged.

On the other hand, the witness G did not directly consider the victim from this court to the time when the defendant A scam as a beer's disease. However, the defendant A and the victim scambling each other and the defendant A scambling the beer's disease in the process. Other evidence, such as the witness G's statement, is supported by the victim's statement.

After all, Defendant A entered in this part of the facts charged.

arrow