logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2020.09.09 2020고단135
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a KS7 car.

On February 22, 2020, the Defendant operated the above car at around 01:49, and continued 34 national highways, which were under the control of the leader of Sadong-si Pungdong-si, to the Gyeongbuk-do Office.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by thoroughly operating a driver of a motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence of driving the car by neglecting it, caused the shock absorption facilities installed at the front section of the car at the front section by the negligence of the defendant, and caused the collision to the Central Separation Zone, which led to the conflict between the two-lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the shock absorption facilities, etc. to move to KRW 5,829,000 for repair costs, left the two-lanes as it is, and escaped without taking necessary measures despite the occurrence of traffic danger and impediment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal land, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on actual situation, internal investigation report (in relation to the site of a traffic accident), investigation report (Attachment of 112 Report Report) (Attachment to the register of vehicle A driver's licenses for suspects and the register of vehicle A and the register of vehicle accident data);

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a situation unfavorable to the defendant that the defendant, who caused a traffic accident, escaped without causing damage to road facilities and taking necessary measures, and the nature of such crime is not good. The defendant has been punished three times due to a traffic-related crime such as drunk driving, etc.

However, the defendant.

arrow