A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car in the DCo as well as driving a car.

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:55, and proceeded along the five-lane road in front of 359-2, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, in accordance with three-lanes from the side of the network, to the distance of the network.

At the time, there was a signal at night and at the front, so the defendant engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the steering wheel and the steering gear in accordance with the new code by accurately operating the steering wheel and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was in the front part of the said car, which the Defendant was driving by the victim E who was in the atmosphere signaled in the front direction while he was negligent in driving while driving the fK5-si.

After causing such an accident, the Defendant left the left from the right edge of the network well-distance to the left edge without taking any measure, and left the left at the right edge, while leaving the scene, the Defendant received the front part of the HT-100 Oral Ba, driven by the victim G, who was in the signal atmosphere, from the right edge of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, in front of the right edge of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

At around 01:05 on the same day, while the Defendant continued to leave the scene without any measure, the Defendant left the scene of the accident without taking any measures to take the front part of the victim I driven by Jystetnael, J. Syeteteta, which was driving in the three-lane direction, while driving along the same four-lanes from the underground lane to the middle-lane in the same way, while driving along the same four-lanes from the underground lane, and without taking any measures to take the front part of the car driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence to exchange the victim E’s above taxi with back-winger.