logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.08 2015구합105567
의사면허자격정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s member of the Cheongju-si Cheongdong-gu Cheongju-si B, “C dental clinic (hereinafter “instant member”).

B) A dentist who has established and operated a dental clinic. D and E are employed by the Plaintiff, and serve as a dental sanitarian at the instant dental clinic. 1. Not only Defendant D and E-public health professionals are prohibited from providing medical services, and dental sanitarians, who are medical technicians, shall perform their duties within the scope prescribed by the Act, under the instruction of dentists, who are medical professionals. Nevertheless, the Defendants, who are not medical professionals, performed dental hygiene services at around 0:00 on November 30, 2012 with respect to patients, who were found to have been at the instant dental clinic without the instruction of the dentist, used the medical appliances established in the instant dental clinic, to perform 10,00,000, 30,000, and 10,000,000,000, and 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

'Related criminal judgments' below the above judgment.

The plaintiff, D, and E are the Cheongju District Court 2013No94.

arrow