logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2016노1694
의료법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of the Defendant’s diagnosis and treatment of H, B merely provided a simple advice to H, and did not perform a non-licensed medical practice, and the Defendant did not conspired with B.

B. The Defendant’s act of misapprehension of the legal doctrine constitutes a justifiable act that does not contravene social norms and thus, is dismissed.

2. Determination

A. Medical practice on the assertion of factual misunderstanding shall be conducted only by a medical person, but it shall be permitted that medical practice is conducted under the direction of a medical doctor, a person holding a license for a dental technician under the Act on the Nursing, Nursing Assistants, Medical Technicians, Etc.; however, medical practice shall not be conducted under the direction of a medical doctor or a dentist; however, any other person is prohibited from performing medical practice under the direction of a medical doctor or a dentist; and a part of the whole process of dental practice by a medical doctor is a medical doctor.

Even if the act alone constitutes a medical practice, a non-medical person shall not conduct it, and unless a license or qualification to conduct a medical practice is granted, the person actually has the same level of expertise or ability to conduct the medical practice as that of a medical person.

The same holds true (see Supreme Court Decision 2003Do2903, Sept. 5, 2003). According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, B had a criminal record of having been punished several times due to the violation of the Medical Service Act in which he/she carried out spine correction operations with his/her hand and flick, or with the equipment such as rubber flick, even though he/she is not a medical person. The Defendant, one of the private persons, was aware of the spine correction surgery of B and the Defendant through television while being treated with the diagnosis of spine flick, and H came to receive medical treatment by finding the hospital of the Defendant, and H was weak from the Defendant.

arrow