Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

A. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at around November 18, 2014, driving B Poter truck on the road near the intersection of the Asia-do in the Asia-do in the Asia-do. The Defendant driven the B Poter truck around the intersection of the Asia-do in the Asia-do.

There are two-lanes in the center of the road, in which the center separation cost is installed, and the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear and brakes by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, there was a conflict between the central separation unit and the front part of the driver's seat of the cargo vehicle due to negligent negligence in doing so.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered physical damage of KRW 300,000,00 from the repair dog between the 1st century (SB No. 4W) and the above occupational negligence.

B. The Defendant, who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, was the owner of the cargo set forth in the preceding paragraph “A” and was driving at the nautical miles of the high-run nautical miles without mandatory insurance, from September 25, 2004 to the date set forth in the preceding paragraph “A”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The criminal place;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident actual investigation report, and a traffic accident explanatory note;

1. Registers of driver's licenses, chassiss, and mandatory insurance;

1. Requests for cooperation in submitting written estimates, etc., following the occurrence of a traffic accident, and requests for cooperation in submitting written estimates, etc. following the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act that applies to the choice of punishment, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and 8 of the Act that guarantee motor vehicle accident compensation;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the defendant did not compensate for physical damage on the grounds of sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, it is economically and economically against the time of committing the instant crime.