logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.04.13 2017고단1151
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 2, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, and on March 12, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court.

[Criminal facts]

1. The defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving) and engages in driving of a vehicle B.

On July 1, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.138% during blood transfusion, driven a car and driven the car, and led to two-lanes of the two-lane road in front of the cancer village located in the north dong in the Kunsan-si in the Kunsan-si in the Kunsan-si, Kunsan-si, the Defendant proceeded along two-lanes from the international cultural village located in the Kunsan-dong.

At the time, the truck was parked on the front of the direction, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle without any collision with the parked vehicle by accurately operating the steering direction and the brake system by checking well the right and the right of the vehicle's driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was bread with red light, boomed with snow, delayed time of recognition response, etc., and was parked in front of the direction to the right side of the car by negligence of the Defendant driving the vehicle while making it difficult for him to drive the vehicle normally and making it difficult for him to drive the vehicle.

C The left side of the cargo vehicle was received from LAC (ACs).

Ultimately, the Defendant was injured by the victim D (32) who was driving a motor vehicle in a state in which normal driving of the motor vehicle is difficult due to influence of drinking, resulting in injury to the victim D (32) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle for about four weeks of treatment, such as a breast-frame and closed-down.

2. The defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at least twice as above, violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at the time of Si/Gun in the same time as the statement in paragraph 1.

arrow