logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고정216
명예훼손
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The complainant C did not have sent pictures and videos sent to D.

On July 3, 2013, in order to verify whether the Defendant prepared a written statement submitted to G in a civil lawsuit with the complainant at the F coffee store near Jeju E, the Defendant undermined the reputation of the complainant by openly pointing out false facts. In the process of explaining the circumstances, “C sent pictures and videos sent to D, a new teacher of H elementary school, to D.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A complaint filed by C, G’s protocol of examination of witnesses, and Jeju District Court Decision on June 11, 2014 (201Na2122) Decided June 11, 2014;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. In full view of the Jeju District Court Decision 2013Na2122 (Evidence No. 29 of Evidence No. 29) and the police statement protocol (Evidence No. 285 of Evidence No. 285) as to the Defendant’s assertion of innocence as to D’s statement of the police, C is recognized as having not sent pictures and videos sent to D, and the words such as the facts constituting false facts in the judgment of the court.

The Defendant listens to the words, such as the facts stated in the facts constituting a crime, and makes a talk about sexual harassment against the behavior female women C, or makes an excessive talk about the talks that he had to do so, or demands Swiftships at the drinking place.

In light of the evidence evidence 166 pages), G believed that the above contents were true, and the above statements were made to G. In light of the pro-friendly relationship between G and C, G did not have any possibility that G can spread them to others, and it is not possible for G to spread them, and ② illegality is excluded in line with the public interest. However, according to the witness G’s statement, G and C’s statement, it is difficult to view that G merely have a pro-friendly relationship as an elementary school volunteer teacher, and therefore it is difficult for G to spread the contents of the Defendant’s statement to other persons (the witness G).

arrow