logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2014. 04. 30. 선고 2014두1222 판결
(심리불속행) 지출비용의 구체적인 액수가 확정된 사업연도에 손금산입함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2013Nu1414 ( December 05, 2013)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High 2012 Before 2921 (Law No. 17, 2012)

Title

(C) include expenses in the business year in which the specific amount of the expenditure cost is determined.

Summary

(Summary of the Costs of this case) Unless there are special circumstances, the costs of this case shall be included in the deductible expenses for the business year in which the specific amount of the expense is determined by the actual replacement of the water purifier.

Cases

2014Du1222 Revocation of revocation of disposition of imposing corporate tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAA Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

The Director of the National Tax Service

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Nu1414 decided December 5, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant’s grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided

arrow