A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Measures not to be taken after accidents);

A. On September 14, 2013, the Defendant driven a ckid vehicle around 03:20 on September 14, 2013, and operated the 628-18-18 round-down road from the military industrial complex post office, along one lane from the office of the military industrial complex.

At the time, there were nights and parked cars on the road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by seeing the front door and accurately manipulating steering devices, brakes, etc. to those engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, shocked the part of the victim E-wing and Ⅲ, who was parked on the right side of the above vehicle, in front of the right side of the vehicle in front of the above string, and shocked the upper part of the string of the vehicle in front of the right side of the vehicle in front of the string E-wing and Ⅲ, which was parked on the right side of the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures such as immediately stopping and checking damage damage by immediately stopping a vehicle to the extent of KRW 714,655 at the repair cost, such as the 728,515 won, and the rocketing vehicle, such as the winger, etc., at the repair cost, such as the winger, etc. by these occupational negligence.

B. At around 03:20 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant continuously driven approximately 50 meters of a traffic accident, such as the above paragraph A, and continued to drive approximately 50 meters on the road in front of 633-10, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, and neglected to exercise the duty of care as described in the above paragraph A, and shocked the part behind the victim G-owned vehicle, which was parked at that place, with the front part of the said Haak-si.

Ultimately, the Defendant indicted the above racul vehicle as '714,655 won', such as repair cost of 426,633 won by negligence in the course of business, but is a clerical error.

The investigation records shall be immediately stopped even after they are damaged to the extent of 74,76 pages.