logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.19 2017누63933
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this case is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In other words, the part concerning the dismissal is that “a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment” in the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance is likely to be sentenced to imprisonment”.

Until the second 21st 21th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st.

The third fourth sentence of the first instance judgment is “I do not exist,” and the Plaintiff prepared the grounds for refugee application at the time of refugee interview by false means, and there is no fact that Egypt was threatened, and there was also statement that he/she applied for refugee status in order to punish money by legally staying in the Republic of Korea.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow