Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, with respect to the defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A is a person who has operated the G in the fourth floor of the F Building in Si interest-si, and the defendant A is an auditor of the above company and is in charge of affairs such as business and conclusion of the contract.

On January 3, 2012, the Defendants conspiredd to the victim I’s house of H apartment 102 Dong 904 and 160 million won of the construction fund, and made a false statement to the victim who intends to start up the KH apartment 102 Dong 904 at the victim’s house of H apartment 102 Dong 904, and to start up the KH apartment 160 million won of the construction fund, “If the construction cost is paid in advance to our subordinate company, it may complete the KHG construction with the fund. The secured fund will be paid in advance.”

However, the above amount was insufficient to complete the above public announcement source construction, and the Defendants did not appropriate most of the construction cost already received from the victims to the above public announcement source construction and planned to use it as expenses for other construction sites and company operation expenses in progress by the Defendants, and there was no intention or ability to complete the above public announcement source construction even if the Defendants received the above construction cost from the victims, such as the outstanding amount to be paid to the subcontractor is equal to 60 million won.

As such, the Defendants: (a) induced the victim; (b) entered into an Indian subcontract construction contract with the victim with the total construction cost of KRW 162 million; (c) received KRW 60 million under the name of the bank account in the name of the Bank in the name of the Bank in charge of the settlement of accounts; (d) KRW 19 million under the name of the first intermediate payment on January 5, 2012; (c) KRW 33 million under the name of the second intermediate payment on January 13, 2012; and (d) received KRW 5.7 million under the name of the second intermediate payment on February 15, 2012; and (e) acquired the money by means of the electric voltage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness I, J and K;

1. Some description of each prosecutorial suspect examination protocol concerning Defendants and L

1. Part I of the statement statement of the police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each police statement on I, J, L, K, M, and N.