logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.17 2014고단850
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny for 2 years and 120 hours in prison for a year. On July 25, 2014, the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 25, 2014.

After the Defendant became aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by forging documents, etc. through online site search, the Defendant conspiredd with B, C, D, E, etc., and, in fact, the Defendant concluded a lease contract with respect to the above apartment, even though the Defendant did not have concluded a lease contract with respect to the apartment owned by F, and provided the deposit with a financial institution as if the lease deposit was paid, the Defendant forged the lease contract with respect to the apartment, etc.

1. On July 22, 2013, the Defendant conspireds with B, C, D, and E, and the Defendant took place in the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu, Young-si as the lessee. As if the lessor is, C took place as if he/she was a lessor, and C took place in the indication column of the real estate in the apartment lease agreement, stating that “Seoul J, J, 1014” in the resident registration number column, “K,” and “F” in the resident registration number column, “L” and “L” in the resident registration number column, and “F” in the name and seal of F. F.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, E, etc., forged one copy of the apartment lease contract in F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On July 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with B, C, D, E, etc., filed an application for a loan to an employee in charge of the loan that knew of the forgery; (b) submitted the forged apartment pre-sale contract as if it were duly concluded.

3. The Defendant’s fraud in collusion with B, C, D, E, etc., and the said bank at the time and place specified in paragraph 2 of the said Article.

arrow