The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The victim's statement of the summary of the grounds for appeal is reversed several times, without credibility, and the victim's symptoms, such as the diagnosis statement, can always observe the patient with the above eromatic spirit, and there is no fact that the defendant is able to drive away the victim away from the defendant's job, and there is no fact that the victim was able to do so.

2. Determination:

A. In light of the following facts revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below in relation to the victim's statement, it is difficult to interpret the part of the victim's statement to the effect that, although there are some other circumstances in the investigative agency and the court of the court below, the victim only appeared to be inconsistent or inconsistent with the contents, not the specific and additional explanations, and the part of the victim's statement to the effect that the victim was assaulted in order to get a bicycle, is somewhat different from the part of the victim's statement, but the part of the victim's statement to the effect that "the victim " intending to get a bicycle," was a bicycle, not the part of the victim's statement to the effect that he/she went out of the way to get a bicycle.

In the overall context, the defendant's drinking consistently went beyond the victim's left chest.

There is no credibility in such a case.

1. The victim was left behind the place where there was an obstacle subsequent to the fact that the defendant left on the left on the left on the lower left.

2. The victim made a statement that he/she had a part of his/her left chest on the floor in the manner that he/she had a part of his/her left chest in drinking in order to get out of his/her bath and to get out of his/her bicycle, and that he/she had a part of his/her mouth on the floor by shocking it.