The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant spits or spits the victim, there is no fact that the Defendant spits or spits the part of the Defendant.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts: ① The victim tried to go at home by the investigative agency: (a) the defendant Da and C want to go to the house by "the head of the association," and (b) the defendant 3 times spits the defendant's face. The defendant spits his chest into the association office because it takes place in the event of the event, and the other party does not want to go to go to go to the association office. In addition, the defendant tried to get water into the association office and to spread to the author with water, and the defendant tried to go to go to do so in the back of the World Cup, and the victim's statement is also deemed to be highly reliable by taking into account the following circumstances: (c) The defendant's remaining part of the victim's statement that he was satisfing with the victim's face and satisfing the victim's chest immediately after his death in the front, and (d) the defendant made a statement to the extent of credibility of the victim's statement."

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. As to the allegation of unfair sentencing, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by assaulting the victim at the end of the trial and the end of the trial as a matter of the information disclosure of the Housing Redevelopment Association, and the nature of the crime is not good, and no measures are taken for the recovery of the victim's damage.