beta
Text
1. Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 52,587,105 as well as 20% per annum from June 15, 2017 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. As the judgment on the claim against the defendant B made a confession of the grounds for the attachment of the plaintiff's assertion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified.
2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C
A. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized in full view of Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2-1, Eul evidence No. 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
1) The Defendants, among their own land, have jointly operated Eelel located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun from April 17, 2014. However, there is currently a legal dispute over the distribution of profits. 2) On October 27, 2017, the Plaintiff received a written confirmation of overdue pay from the head of the Ulsan District Office of the Busan District Office from April 17, 2014 to May 31, 2017 of the Plaintiff and the period of service of the employees in arrears from the head of the Ulsan District Office of the Plaintiff and the employees in arrears, from April 17, 2014 to May 31, 2017, the place of business in arrears was Eel and the employees in arrears were 52,587,105 won [the amount of overdue pay = 48,00,000 won [the amount of overdue pay = 1,500,000 won per month from October 20 to May 2017).
B. The Plaintiff’s assertion is jointly operated with Defendant B, and the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendants in 1,50,000 monthly wage of KRW 1,50,000 to May 31, 2017, and retired from office after providing the Defendants with guidance, cleaning, repair, etc., but the Defendants did not receive wages of KRW 48,00,00 from October 17, 2014 to May 2017 as well as retirement allowances of KRW 52,587,105,00 from May 2017. As such, Defendant C is jointly and severally and severally liable to pay the said money and delay damages to the Plaintiff.
C. For the following reasons, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant C is without merit.
1. The fact that the Plaintiff received a written confirmation of the business owner with overdue wages and retirement allowances in arrears from the head of the Ulsan District Office of the Busan District Office as alleged above, but the Defendants are the business owner with overdue wages, etc. in the said written confirmation.