logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고단1845
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment was finalized on May 2, 2013.

The Defendant, on behalf of his father, did not have the right to make a contract on the part of the deceased vehicle under his name, but had the right to make a contract on the part of the father, and had the right to make a contract on the part of the deceased vehicle.

1. On February 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated that “B”, “F”, and “B” in the “B” and “B” in the resident registration number column for the place of residence in the applicant column, and written “B” in the applicant column; (b) stated “B” in the applicant column; and (c) held in advance subsequent to the name of the applicant column.

B's seal impression has been stamped.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for the loan of modern capital in B, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, submitted a forged written application to the above E, which was aware of the forgery, and exercised it as if it was duly formed.

3. The Defendant submitted a forged statement at the same time and at the same place as above to the Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. of the victim and acted as if the Defendant was B by receiving a telephone call from the victim company B to confirm himself/herself.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim company as above, caused the victim company to immediately transfer KRW 21 million to the Korean bank account (100528107804) in the name of Changdong Co., Ltd. as the vehicle price in the fourth Scoo (H) on the said job, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of examination of witness to E:

arrow