Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 10:00, installed the locking devices of each guest room owned by the victim E, F, G, H, H, I, J, and K at “D,” located in Pyeongtaek-gun, Suwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, and one parcel of land, arbitrarily replaced the lock devices of each guest room owned by the victim with a new locking device.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the locking device, which is owned by the victims of the Si's non-accident.

2. On February 10, 2016, the Defendant, who intruded upon a residence, had been accommodated in each guest room owned by the said victims even if no consent was given by the victim L, I, and J at the above location.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A criminal investigation report (the content of conversation between the complainant and Kakaoo);

1. Investigation report (verification of whether the donations, such as contribution, cadastral map, building register, and local marks are consistent);

1. Complaint;

1. Names of complainants and guest addresses;

1. Details of a report made to sell housing after checking the scene of intrusiond property damage;

1. Evidential materials and written warnings of unlawful use and evidential materials of unlawful use;

1. Land for replacing the key of the guest room of a seller in lots and for sericultural work;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include favorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes, the circumstances that have not yet reached an agreement with the victims even after considerable time has passed since each of the instant crimes, and other circumstances, such as the background of the instant crimes, the circumstances after the instant crimes, etc., shall be determined as ordered by taking account of various circumstances.