logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단4336
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 10, 2017, at around 03:20 on October 10, 2017, the Defendant damaged property received the entrance glass and locking devices from the head in order to enter the house.

Accordingly, the defendant has destroyed and damaged the fluoral glass in the market price, which is the victim's possession, and damaged the locking device by attaching it thereto.

2. The Defendant who intrudes upon a residence has reached the date, time, and place indicated in paragraph 1. As described in paragraph 1, the Defendant accompanied the entrance glass and locking equipment of the said victim C’s residence, and entered the entrance door to the said house and invaded upon the victim’s residence.

3. The Defendant, at the inside of the victim C’s residence located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was removed by asking the victim C’s face and body as soon as possible, and asking the victim C’s face and body in drinking in a conspiracy to the victim C (63 tax) who talked to “p. . ......” during the day specified in paragraph 1.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to set up a victim D (the age of 72) who resides with the victim C, and the defendant was removed from the defendant, and the judgment of the victim D was asked to be removed.

As a result, the Defendant provided the victim C with a warning that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim D with a warning that requires approximately two weeks of treatment respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime;

1. The Defendant’s reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes is against the time of committing the instant crime.

However, it is not good for the defendant to commit violence against the victims by using the victim's entrance and intrusion on the new wall.

arrow