The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The following facts are considered: (a) the Defendant’s erroneous determination of the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against his/her own mistake and disposes of the vehicle; (b) the Defendant has no record of being punished for a crime other than the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving); and (c) there is any family member to support the Defendant. However, even though the Defendant had been sentenced five times a fine due to driving without a license again, he/she was sentenced to imprisonment for 4 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) and a suspended sentence for 2 years on November 22, 2012; (c) even before the lapse of one month; (d) the Defendant was punished by a fine or suspended the execution of imprisonment for a violation of traffic regulations; (e) the Defendant was unable to assist the Defendant in extinguishing the habitness of traffic offense; (d) the Defendant appears to have obtained an opportunity to obtain a license for future traffic regulations by stating that it is inevitable due to the characteristics of his/her occupation, which he/she has already been sentenced to five times a fine for driving without license; (e.) The circumstances leading to obtaining the Defendant’s age and justification of the instant driver’s.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.