The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The following should be taken into account: (a) the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s crime of unfair sentencing as to the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing; (b) the Defendant’s mistake is against his own mistake; (c) the Defendant’s injury is insignificant even though the Defendant has almost been under close collision with the victim of a traffic accident; (d) the Defendant has already been sentenced four times a fine due to drinking without a license on October 9, 2009; and (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months due to a driving without a license on drinking; (e) the Defendant committed the instant crime by drinking without a license on September 9, 209; (e) the Defendant was punished by a fine or suspended the execution of imprisonment for the Defendant’s failure to assist the Defendant to abandon the dampness of traffic offense; and (e) the sentence of imprisonment is inevitable; and (e) the Defendant’s punishment is also punished by the Road Traffic Act on more than two occasions after his driving without a license on drinking; and (e) the Defendant’s age, circumstances before and after his driving without a license on drinking; (e.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.