logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.09.24 2013고정478
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Crane car.

On 04. 09:29 on 04. 04. 09:29, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, leading the crosswalk in front of the Central Home Center in Chuncheon City to the direction of the arms plaza from the spare distance room.

Since a crosswalk is installed at each other, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the road well and to drive the road.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of neglecting this, the victim D (74 years of age, south) who dried the crosswalk to the right side from the left side of the driving vehicle of the defendant, was faced with the injury of the victim, i.e., cutting down the pellet, which requires treatment for about 14 weeks, by shocking the front side of the driver's vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Reports on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the Defendant’s depth in committing the crime, the victim does not want the Defendant’s punishment by mutual consent with the victim, and the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle appears to be capable of recovering damage due to being covered by comprehensive insurance, and other circumstances shown in the proceedings of the instant case, including the character, conduct, environment and health of the Defendant, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow