The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In order to know that G was refusing to take passengers, the Defendant was aware of the fact that G was about about five minutes before the village bus in this case, and there was no intention to obstruct G’s village bus operation.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the following circumstances that can be recognized by mistake of facts: (1) the defendant was unable to get off the E Village bus from K Station to get out of a stop which is under influence of alcohol and again waiting for the village bus in the opposite direction; (3) on May 15, 2013, G driving with the opposite 00:20 on the third line running at the 3rd line with the closing point, the village bus of this case is running beyond the center line, and it is stipulated that the village bus of this case will stop in the front line of the village bus of this case for a period exceeding the center line, and (2) after the defendant requested that the village bus of this case be used as a village bus entering the close point of the defendant, and the defendant was forced to report as 12, and the defendant was forced to interfere with the operation of the bus of this case, and (4) after the dispatch of the bus of this case, the defendant continued to interfere with the operation of the village of this case, the defendant's allegation that the above part of G bus of this case was 10.

B. The Defendant denies and does not reflect the instant crime until the first offense was committed, and did not make efforts to recover damage to the victim.