The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of the grounds for appeal is examined to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed.

A. Defendant 1: the lower court convicted Defendant 1 of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of facts. However, the lower court found Defendant 1 guilty of the receipt of bribe against the Defendant. However, in relation to the I’s testimony by the Prosecutor’s Office, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. (A) The first statement made by I to Defendant 1 was recognized as having been in the first time when the Defendant issued KRW 25 million to the prosecution for the instant crime; and (2) the first statement made by I as a policeman on April 2013 was recognized as having been in fact known as having been in fact; and (3) the first statement made by the Defendant was not specified from the beginning on the date of delivery of KRW 25 million; (4) the first statement made by the Defendant on the third floor of the H restaurant to the effect that the Defendant only made a confession on the third floor of the 3 restaurant; and (5) the circumstances leading up to the first statement made by the Prosecutor and the first statement made by the Prosecutor to the effect that I had no consistency in the testimony.

B. Regarding the Defendant’s confession statement at the prosecution, the Defendant, at the time of his defense counsel’s solicitation, led to the confession of the instant crime and without any particular consideration, 25 million won A4.