1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate Plaintiff 1 through 19, 22 through 32, 35 through 49, 51 through 56, respectively.

A. The Plaintiff’s apartment and the “new apartment” mean the Defendant’s apartment.

E.

D. As a result of the appraisal, the J which made a long appraisal as to whether the right to enjoy sunshine exceeding the limit of admission and the infringement of the right to access to the plaintiff's apartment due to the new construction of the defendant apartment building occurred, and the market price decline in the plaintiff's apartment building was reported to this court as follows.

o New apartment construction of the Defendant, where the right to sunshine exceeding the tolerance limit of the Plaintiff’s apartment complex and infringement of the astronomic't have occurred, - Generations whose number exceeds the tolerance limit of 】 (hereinafter “households beyond the tolerance limit after new construction” in the annexed Table 2 table “(4)” were included in the new construction of new apartment complex, and whose number of households exceeded the tolerance limit of the Defendant’s new construction is due to the infringement of the right to sunshine exceeding the tolerance limit of the Defendant’s apartment complex and the right to astronomic't have been infringed (including households which are marked with red in the following table) - QV - QV - QV W AB AD AF AF AF AE AF AF AF AH AF AH AF AF AF AH 20,000, less than the maximum tolerance limit of 10% per day before and after the new construction of new apartment complex, but more than the total tolerance limit of the Defendant’s new construction of apartment complex than 2,000 per day before the date.

(However, considering that the view has been beautiful due to trees in front of the generation in the first and second floors, the rate of infringement on the network of mutual assistance by households exceeding the limit of admission is less than 45 per cent and more than 10 per cent which is less than 45 per cent. o and the market price decline due to the infringement on the right of mutual assistance and the right of mutual assistance, which exceeds the limit of admission, exceeds the limit of admission due to the infringement on the right of mutual assistance and the right of mutual assistance by households exceeding the limit of admission.