1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiffs each of the following amounts: the sum of damages (5) (8) in [Attachment 2] column and each of the above amounts.

B. The current status of the arrangement of the plaintiff apartment and defendant apartment as of the present status of the arrangement of apartment and defendant apartment is as shown below.

Under the following, “E apartment” of the forest is the Plaintiff’s apartment, but this is “E apartment” and “new apartment” refers to the Plaintiff’s apartment, and “New apartment” refers to the Defendant’s apartment, respectively. - Influence for the forest - EJ

D. As a result of the appraisal, K which has assessed whether the right to enjoy sunshine exceeding the tolerance limit and the infringement of the right to enjoy natural cooperation network was occurred on the plaintiff's apartment due to the new construction of the defendant apartment, and thereby, K which has assessed the decline in the market price of the plaintiff's apartment was reported to this court as follows.

o Along with the construction of a new apartment, the right to sunshine exceeding the tolerance limit and the right to a astronomical lighting network was infringed upon - The plaintiff apartment was newly constructed that the right to sunshine exceeding the tolerance limit and the right to a astronomical fishing network was infringed upon - Specifically * (right to sunshine) the plaintiff apartment was the total sunshine hours of at least 4 hours per day before the construction of the new apartment, but the maximum sunshine hours were at least 2 hours per day after the construction of the new apartment, but the total sunshine hours of less than 4 hours per day after the construction of the defendant apartment was less than 60.6 hours per day, and the maximum sunshine hours were reduced to less than 2 hours per hour, and the minimum sunshine hours were at least 75.2%, which were higher than 60.6%, the plaintiff apartment was nameed at 100% before the construction of the new apartment, but the rate of the plaintiff apartment's right to a 0-10% increase in the market price due to the fall above 0-10% of the pre-2,000.