logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.24 2017고정946
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a motor vehicle dealer who belongs to Bupyeong-si B 103, B 103.

1. Where a motor vehicle dealer who violates the Motor Vehicle Management Act advertises motor vehicles via the Internet, he/she shall keep the performance, condition inspection record, etc. of used motor vehicles as determined by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, such as the history and seller information of the motor vehicle;

Nevertheless, on March 22, 2017, the Defendant posted “F Company G” advertisement on the D’s website at a place where it is difficult to know the place around March 22, 2017. However, the Defendant posted “F Company G” advertisement on the D’s website.

Accordingly, the Defendant posted a false used car advertisement.

2. The Defendant, by posting a false article on the website, entices customers by soliciting them, and entering into the first contract at a price that makes it impossible for them to sell the goods posted on the website and other vehicles (No. 1) at a normal price, and received the vehicle price, and then, the Defendant, on the basis of his/her own attitude, had to pay additional expenses, such as a succeeded gold, which does not exist on the ground that it is a light or a short sale vehicle, by taking care of his/her attitude, and had the customer gain profits by selling two vehicles different from those anticipated at the beginning.

On March 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) purchased the Defendant’s SM3 car at KRW 1.8 million instead of purchasing the Defendant’s SM3 car at KRW 1.8 million; and (b) sold the Defendant’s vehicle at KRW 9.1.50,000 in KRW 9.150,000.

“A contract for acquisition by transfer between a victim and a vehicle shall be prepared, and KRW 9,150,000 shall be remitted from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the defendant.

Since then, the defendant is the victim's own "this vehicle is a litigation vehicle, and the liquidation value or seizure mortgage should be considered.

"Falsely speaking," and when the injured person requests the cancellation of the contract, there is only a way to buy another vehicle.

arrow