1. The defendant shall appoint the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party:

A. Attached Form 1 among the 6,003 square meters of forest land Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The facts of recognition are part of co-owners who have acquired the share of 6,003 square meters of Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B forest land between March 2010 and May 2010, and each co-owner’s co-ownership share is as indicated in the co-ownership column of “amount claimed by the selected party” in attached Form 2.

The defendant asserted from September 11, 2012 that the plaintiff was from September 201 to September 201, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

Of the above land, the above land possesses a part of 121 square meters in the ship which connects each point of the attached Table 15, 16, 17, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 8, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, and 15 of the land in sequence and connects each point of the attached Table 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, and 15 of the land in the ship (hereinafter “instant land”), and owns the part of the block in the order of 58 square meters and the above drawings, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 111 of the land in the ship.

[Reasons for Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-7, Eul evidence No. 1, the result of the appraiser C's survey and appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant, as an act of preserving jointly-owned property, has a duty to remove the building of this case to the plaintiff (appointed parties) and the appointed parties seeking the removal of the building of this case and the delivery of the land of this case, and deliver the land of this case, and return the unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent gained by occupying and using the land of this case.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. A. The gist of defense D purchased the instant building from E, the owner of the instant land and the instant building, around 1960, and the Defendant purchased the instant building from D around September 11, 2012, and as such, the Defendant acquired the instant building from D who acquired statutory superficies under the customary law.