Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At around 23:20 on September 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report to the effect that “two male managers assault in front of the Studio C Studle door at the Government-Si of the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of public duties by police officers for about 10 minutes by threatening the above police officers by threateninging them to ask questions about the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant case from the Gu Police Station D District E affiliated with the Gu Police Station D District E, and Police Officer F, who was flaged by hand.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement to E by the police;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the crime is committed against the will of the offender, and the details and circumstances of the crime);
1. Probation and community service order shall be decided as ordered by the court on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;