logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.14 2016고합170
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is guilty of the facts charged that he knows that it was around 16:00 on the first half of the year 2015, and that he would purchase bruted rice to C (Gain, Gain, D) with the knowledge of it.

The contact with “Acheon-gu, South-gu, F Women’s Middle Schools in South-gu E was blicking with the victim, leading the victim to reporting and desireing to rape.

At around 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant gets the victim's grandchildren to the top floor of the Nam-gu G apartment unit in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant 1, 200 on the rooftop, and 30 on the rooftop, 8:0, 200, 200, 200, and 30:0 on the roof, and 30,000, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,00,00,00,

“In doing so, the victim was raped by inserting the Defendant’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ once in the victim’s sexual organ.

Accordingly, the defendant raped the victim who is a child or juvenile through violence or intimidation.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. Although the summary of the argument is recognized that sexual intercourse with the victim was established, there was no rape by assault or intimidation, such as the facts charged, and there was no agreement.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by each evidence adopted and investigated by the court of this case, it is difficult to believe that the victim C’s investigative agency and legal statement, which are evidence conforming to the facts charged of this case, are difficult to eliminate the possibility that the victim’s statements were made in exaggerationd differently from the actual facts and content of sexual relations, and the remaining evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

(1) The police officers, the prosecution, and the statements of each damage in this court shall be the crime of this case and the statements thereof.

arrow