A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2015, at around 08:50 on April 21, 2015, the Defendant stolen the gap in E operated by the victim D in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, with a bank holding the victim’s cash of KRW 2.50,000,000, and one cell phone with the market price of KRW 500,000,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter Three CCTV photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is the theft of general property (general larceny) and there is no basic area (six to one year and six months) (special person) [decision of sentence] [decision of sentence] The defendant has been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, but has old age and is suffering from alcohol dementia.