logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016.03.25 2015나778
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff Co., Ltd., which is equivalent to the following additional payments.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts is that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (However, among them, the term “Plaintiff Daecheon Development” is entirely different from that of “Plaintiff Kimcheon Development”), and they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof

A. Since the Plaintiffs’ general assertion that the construction work of this case was executed or disbursed as follows, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 822,280,000 to Plaintiff Kimcheon Development for the repayment of the construction cost or the expenditure cost, and KRW 300,040,000 to Plaintiff Ssung Development for 300,000 and delay damages therefor.

1) Plaintiff Kim Development: 822,280,00 won for third-class reinforced concrete works: 240,130,00 won [2,256,40,000 won] ¡¿ 50% (the defendant's share ratio)-8,070,00 won for fourth-class works.

B. Determination 1) According to the above basic facts, the Plaintiffs completed each of the above construction works according to the contract with the Defendant and the Newjin Construction Division, according to the following basic facts: (a) from among the existing subcontracting works in the instant case, the third soil works, the second reinforced concrete construction works, and the second stone construction costs; and (b) the Defendant completed the said construction works.

arrow